Estate Planning for Business Owners – Protecting Control, Continuity and Value

Vanessa Caputo

Principal Lawyer

For business owners, estate planning is rarely just about who inherits assets. It is about control, continuity and liquidity at a moment when the business is most vulnerable. A well-intentioned but poorly structured plan can stall decision-making, trigger disputes, or force the sale of an otherwise healthy enterprise.

This article looks at estate planning through the lens of business ownership. It focuses on what happens at death, where plans commonly break down, and how experienced advisers structure arrangements so businesses can continue to operate while family interests are managed sensibly.

 

Why business owners face different risks

A business is not a passive asset. It requires decisions, signatures, and cash flow. When an owner dies, those needs do not pause. Staff still need to be paid, contracts honoured, and regulatory obligations met.

The risks that arise for business owners tend to fall into three categories:

  • Control risk – who can make decisions immediately after death?

  • Continuity risk – can the business keep operating without disruption?

  • Value risk – is the business forced into a sale at the wrong time?

Traditional estate planning often focuses on distribution. For business owners, the first question should usually be control.

 

Ownership versus control

One of the most common misunderstandings is assuming that ownership and control are the same thing. They are not.

A person may own shares in a company, but control often sits with:

  • the board of directors,

  • the trustee of a trust,

  • or whoever holds key decision-making powers under governing documents.

On death, shares may pass under a Will, but control may not. If the structure is not aligned, beneficiaries can inherit value without inheriting authority, or vice versa. Either scenario can create conflict.

Effective estate planning for business owners starts by mapping where control actually sits, not where people assume it sits.

 

Companies and shares

Where a business is operated through a company, the owner’s shares will usually form part of their estate. That does not automatically resolve who controls the company day to day.

Key issues include:

  • who appoints or removes directors,

  • whether there are multiple shareholders with different interests,

  • whether shareholders’ agreements restrict transfers on death, and

  • whether the executor has the power to step into the deceased’s shoes temporarily.

Executors often discover that, while they hold shares, they have limited practical ability to influence the company without cooperation from others.

 

Trust structures and control

Many businesses operate through discretionary trusts. In these structures, legal ownership and beneficial enjoyment are separated.

Control usually sits with:

  • the trustee, and

  • the appointor (or similar role).

From an estate planning perspective, the appointor role is often more important than the trust assets themselves. Whoever controls the appointor role can ultimately control the trust.

Failing to deal with succession of the appointor on death is one of the most common and serious planning oversights for business owners.

 

What happens immediately after death

The period immediately after death is often overlooked in planning, yet it is when the greatest risk arises.

Questions that often surface include:

  • Who can sign contracts or cheques today?

  • Can bank facilities continue?

  • Can the business enter or exit transactions?

  • What happens if a co-owner refuses to cooperate?

A Will that works perfectly on paper may offer no practical solution in the first weeks or months after death. Good planning anticipates this gap and addresses interim control.

 

Buy–sell arrangements

Buy–sell agreements are a common tool in multi-owner businesses. In theory, they provide a clean exit: the deceased’s interest is sold, and their estate receives value.

In practice, buy–sell arrangements often fail because:

  • they are not properly funded,

  • valuations are outdated or unclear,

  • they conflict with Wills or trust deeds, or

  • they rely on insurance that no longer exists or is inadequate.

When buy–sell arrangements are used, they must be integrated with the estate plan, not bolted on separately.

 

Liquidity on death

Even where control issues are addressed, liquidity remains a major challenge. Businesses are often asset-rich but cash-poor.

Common liquidity pressures include:

  • paying estate debts or tax,

  • funding family provision claims,

  • equalising distributions between business and non-business beneficiaries, and

  • avoiding forced asset sales.

Life insurance, retained earnings, or staged buy-outs can all play a role, but only if planned deliberately. Without liquidity planning, executors may have little choice but to sell assets under pressure.

 

Testamentary trusts and business interests

Testamentary discretionary trusts are frequently used by business owners, particularly where:

  • children are involved in the business to different degrees,

  • asset protection is a concern, or

  • control is intended to be exercised over time.

However, placing business interests into testamentary trusts raises additional questions:

  • Who will act as trustee?

  • Do they have the skills to manage or oversee the business?

  • How will conflicts between business and non-business beneficiaries be managed?

In many cases, separating control from benefit is sensible. In others, it simply shifts conflict into a different forum. There is no single correct answer, but the question must be addressed consciously.

 

Family dynamics and expectations

Business estates often sit at the centre of family tension. Common scenarios include:

  • one child working in the business while others do not,

  • assumptions that “the business child” should receive everything,

  • expectations of equal treatment despite unequal involvement, and

  • informal promises made over many years.

Courts do not enforce family understandings unless they are reflected in formal arrangements. Where expectations and documents diverge, disputes are likely.

Clear planning, and sometimes difficult conversations during life, reduce the scope for misunderstanding later.

 

Superannuation and business succession

Superannuation is often treated separately from business planning, but for many owners it represents a significant pool of value. This can particularly be the case if a self-managed superannuation fund owns business assets, such as the premises from which the business operates.

In addition, decisions about whether superannuation is paid:

  • directly to beneficiaries, or

  • into the estate,

can materially affect the balance between business and non-business beneficiaries. In some cases, superannuation provides the liquidity needed to allow business interests to remain intact.

As with other aspects of planning, alignment matters more than the specific choice.

 

What executors struggle with most

From a practitioner’s perspective, executors administering business estates commonly struggle with:

  • lack of information about the business structure,

  • resistance from surviving business partners,

  • unclear or conflicting documents, and

  • pressure from beneficiaries with competing interests.

Executors are often expected to “just sort it out”, despite having limited authority or experience in running a business. Planning that assumes an executor will simply step in and manage a business is rarely realistic.

 

When plans unravel

Even careful plans can unravel if they are not reviewed. Common triggers include:

  • changes in business structure,

  • new shareholders or partners,

  • growth in business value,

  • relationship breakdowns, and

  • changes in health or capacity.

An estate plan that worked when the business was small may be inappropriate once it becomes the primary family asset.

Regular review is not a luxury for business owners; it is a necessity.

 

Planning with disputes in mind

Experienced advisers plan with disputes in mind, not because conflict is inevitable, but because it is common.

This means:

  • identifying likely points of friction,

  • structuring control deliberately,

  • ensuring documents are consistent across entities, and

  • providing executors with clear authority.

A plan that assumes cooperation is fragile. A plan that anticipates disagreement is usually more robust.

 

Key takeaway

For business owners, estate planning is as much about governance and continuity as it is about inheritance. Wills, trusts, shareholder agreements and superannuation arrangements must work together if the business is to survive the owner’s death without unnecessary disruption.

The most effective plans are those that recognise the realities of business, family dynamics and human behaviour, and address them head-on rather than hoping for the best.

  

Related Guides — Wills & Estates Law in NSW

Estate planning for business owners involves protecting your business interests while also planning for your personal and family’s future. The following guides cover other key aspects of wills, estate administration, and inheritance law in New South Wales to help you build a comprehensive estate plan.

 

Speak to a specialist estate planning lawyer

Our Sydney lawyers have decades of experience dealing with business transactions and business succession planning. To speak with one of our estate planning experts about your business structures and business succession plan, give us a call or submit an enquiry now.

Latest Posts from our Information Centre

What our customers say

The best! Amanda and Andy were a wonderful source of professional advice from start to finish regarding the sale of my property. Super responsive and proactively managed every step of the process, which was so important as this was my first property sale. My estate agent also commented on how efficiently the contract for sale was provided, along with Amanda and Andy's responsiven...

KB

Google

2 months ago

Alan was amazing! He guided us through buying our first property with such care and expertise. He knew exactly what requests and changes to make in the contracts to best protect and benefit us. We couldn’t recommend him highly enough!

Keeley May

Google

2 months ago

I had an excellent experience with Alan and Pamela during my recent property purchase. They were always available to answer questions, very clear in their communication, and incredibly helpful throughout the entire process. Their professionalism and attention to detail made everything smooth and stress-free. I’d highly recommend them to anyone looking for reliable and friendly so...

Manny Paulo

Google

3 months ago

My recent down-sizing involves the selling of a property and the buying of a new one at the same time. The whole process was a smooth and pleasant one, thanks to the help of Thornton + King Law Services. In particular I wish to thank Amanda Chik, my Solicitor for her detailed explanations of the contracts, and Andy Habib, the Conveyancing Manager, for his prompt and professional ...

Chiu Keung Ng

Google

3 months ago

Vanessa and Andy are both highly experienced, professional and extremely helpful. They made the process of selling my property seamless. I have no hesitation recommending or using them again in the future.

Brooke Tesoriero

Google

4 months ago

I wanted to express my sincere gratitude for all the hard work, time, and expertise that Amanda and her team put into our property settlement. Their attention to detail, clear communication, and persistence made what could have been a stressful process so much smoother and less daunting for us. We truly appreciate the extra effort you went to on our behalf — it didn’t go unnotic...

Lena Wang

Google

5 months ago

Vanessa and Andy made the process of buying my first home extremely easy and simple to understand. They were always available to answer any questions I had and to help me troubleshoot any problems I had. Can highly recommend them whether it is your first home or you’ve done it all before.

Niall Oates

Google

5 months ago

I cannot thank Sarah Newman, and Andy, at Thornton and King enough for their incredible support over the past six months. The settlement of my property was long, drawn-out, and at times quite tedious—but throughout the entire process, they were consistently professional, prompt, and reassuring. Sarah and Andy were always available to answer my questions, explain things clearly, a...

Shelley Robertson

Google

6 months ago

Contact Thornton & King Lawyers

Do you have a question about our services? Contact us today, and a member of our team will get back to you soon.